Financial planning built for tech wealth. SuperSymm designs and operates the marketing systems independent advisory firms need to compete for HNW prospects in an AI-search world — calibrated to small-team capacity, compliance reality, and the channels that actually convert.
SuperSymm designs and runs the marketing systems independent advisory firms need to compete for high-net-worth prospects in an AI-search world. Every recommendation is sized to small-team capacity, built around compliance reality, and focused on the channels that actually move clients.
This playbook is built to stand on its own — your team can execute every recommendation in it without us. But the full picture, kept current as the market shifts, comes from ongoing partnership. The strategic insights, the automation, the quarterly recalibration: that's where a playbook becomes a growth engine.
We start with the diagnostic work most firms skip — the market, the competition, and how your real prospects actually search and decide. Channel spending without strategic clarity is the most expensive mistake small firms make.
We build the website, the scheduling, the lead magnets, the analytics — the foundation that makes every downstream investment compound. Until your conversion path works, paid traffic is wasted and organic effort points the wrong direction.
We run search, paid, LinkedIn, email, and content as one connected system — shared audience logic, repurposable assets, a single compliance review queue. Two channels done well always beats four channels done occasionally.
We instrument the conversion paths that matter and run honest quarterly reviews. No bloated attribution dashboards nobody opens — just clear signal on what's working, what isn't, and what to change.
This is not a list of recommendations to file away. It's the diagnostic, the strategy, and the operating plan you need to turn marketing effort into client acquisition — sized to your firm's actual capacity, your compliance reality, and the empirical opportunity the 2025-2026 Seattle tech contraction has put in front of you.
Read it in any order. Execute it in the order we sequence.
A marketing audit is only useful if it leads somewhere. The full playbook runs 14 tabs and covers every channel — but the Executive Summary is where the diagnostic resolves into a clear point of view: where Meridian stands today, what's actually wrong, and the three things that will move the firm forward over the next 90 days.
Meridian has the credentials, the proof points, and a structurally favorable window for new client acquisition. What stands between today and 25-30 new client households over the next year isn't channel selection — it's foundation work, positioning clarity, and the discipline to keep executing once the plan ships.
This score reflects a firm at the inflection point between an established small practice and a scaling firm. The credentials — CFP, CFA, 9 years tenure, SEC-registered, fee-only — are above the baseline. The digital surface sits below what competitors at scale have already built. Moving from D+ to B isn't a longer to-do list — it's the sequenced foundation work this playbook lays out.
Phase 1 spends zero on paid media. Your stated $1,500-$2,000/month budget gets reallocated to infrastructure, cornerstone content, and directory citations through the first 4-6 months. Phase 2 paid amplification comes after the foundation is in place — not before.
The competitive analysis resolves a question Meridian has been carrying internally. There isn't a generalist path that produces sustained distinction in this Bellevue market — and the deep tech-specialist path is already occupied by Consilio at 4x your AUM. The defensible territory is the narrow space between them.
Lean into tech specialization. Do it through narrower surfaces than your competitors have claimed. Execute two channels well rather than four occasionally. That is the strategy.
Marketing strategy starts with understanding the market you're operating in — not assumed, but documented. Where does the wealth actually sit? What's happening to it right now? How are buyers behaving differently than they did three years ago? The answers shape every channel decision that follows.
For Meridian, the picture is unusually favorable. The Seattle Eastside is one of the densest tech-wealth pools in the country, and right now it's in structural disruption rather than expansion. That produces a continuous flow of suddenly-liquid prospects at exactly your target compensation tier — and a window that's open today but won't stay open long.
The 2025-2026 Seattle tech contraction is producing a prospect-timing pattern Meridian can map against rather than wait for. Severance windows, accelerated equity vesting, and post-layoff planning urgency are creating a continuous stream of newly-liquid prospects with acute need for tech-fluent advice.
Five firms shape the competitive surface around Meridian. Two — Consilio and Northern Lights — are the strategic anchors. The other three define the territory you need to avoid (generalist drift) or take ground from (employer-specific scenarios).
Where Meridian sits today against the two anchor competitors — and where the gaps are. Columns marked with the gold border are decision points where deliberate moves in this playbook will close ground.
| Feature | Meridian | Consilio | Northern Lights |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUM / clients | ~$110M / ~140 | $458M / 289 | ~$109M / ~140 |
| Advisor count | 2 advisors | 9 advisors | ~2 advisors |
| Stated minimum | $750K (flexible) | $1M | $1M |
| Fee-only / dual-credential | Yes (CFP + CFA) | Yes (multi-credentialed team) | Yes (CFP + CFA) |
| Employer-specific landing pages | Not yet | MSFT / AMZN / Meta / Google | No |
| Active blog (last 90 days) | Dormant since 2022 | Active | Active |
| Podcast / YouTube channel | No | Both | No |
| Gated lead assets | 1 (4-year-old RSU guide) | Multiple, current | 1 (downloadable checklist) |
| Calendly / direct scheduling | Manual via form | Yes | Yes |
| AI search visibility (5 priority queries) | 0 / 5 appearances | Strong | Partial |
| Trajectory-stage / sub-$1M clients | Can serve (advantage) | Structurally excluded | Structurally excluded |
| Long-tail employer-scenario content | None | Broad employer pages, fewer scenarios | None |
The competitive landscape settles an internal question. Going broader doesn't produce distinction in this market. Going deeper at scale is already taken. The defensible ground is narrow but it's real — and uniquely available to a firm sized like yours.
Consilio's stack is sustained by 9 advisors, not 2. Your job is occupation, not replication.
Effective marketing doesn't start with channels — it starts with a deep understanding of who you're trying to reach, what they care about, and where they spend their attention. The marketing system gets built around the audience, so every piece of content, every campaign, and every automation is shaped for the specific person it needs to reach.
Meridian has three distinct audience types — each with different motivations, different buying authority, and different channel preferences. A two-track design is the most effective operating model for speaking to each of them on their own terms. The Equity Veteran and The Trajectory Builder move through email nurture sequences over 3-10 week research windows — the system watches their behavior and surfaces the right content at the right moment. The Pre-Liquidity Founder converts faster on direct fixed-fee scoping and runs on a separate track built for shorter, statutory-deadline-driven engagement.
The two-track design isn't a marketing framework — it's the operating model. Everything downstream (content topics, lead magnets, ad copy, email sequences, channel choices) flows from these three audiences and the two tracks they belong to.
Established Tech Equity Veteran · Senior IC / Manager / Director · Age 42-54 · Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Google
"Built for the way Microsoft (or Amazon, or Meta, or Google) actually pays you. CFP and CFA. Fee-only. No generalist content."
Sub-$1M Trajectory Tech Professional · Engineer / PM / Senior IC · Age 32-42 · Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Google
"$400K-$900K in tech equity. Most advisors will tell you to come back at $1M. We won't. Real planning, fee-only, with explicit pathways for both one-time plans and ongoing engagement."
Bellevue Tech Founder / CTO / Early-Stage Exec · Age 30-48 · Pre-IPO Bellevue/Seattle Tech
"Statutory-current QSBS coordination for Bellevue founders. We integrate with your startup counsel and tax attorneys — we don't substitute for them."
All three personas — The Equity Veteran, The Trajectory Builder, and The Pre-Liquidity Founder — treat AI search as a primary discovery layer. The Trajectory Builder is essentially AI-search-native. This is the highest-leverage insight in the entire audit. Schema markup, answer-format cornerstone pages on long-tail queries, and citation-worthy depth are higher-priority investments for Meridian than for a typical RIA — by a meaningful margin.
Defensible positioning lives between the personas, not across them.
A well-designed website isn't about looking polished — it's demand-generation architecture. It's the surface where a stranger decides whether to trust you with the next conversation, and it's the only marketing asset that works 24/7 whether or not anyone is posting, emailing, or running ads. For an RIA serving sophisticated buyers, the website does three jobs at once: prove competence in the first 90 seconds, give prospects somewhere to convert when they're ready, and make the firm findable by AI search and humans alike.
Meridian's site was built in 2019 and hasn't been meaningfully updated since 2022. The credentials and substance behind the firm are strong — CFP + CFA, fee-only, 9 years tenure, $120M AUM. The surface presentation gives prospects no way to feel that. Tech-fluent buyers like The Equity Veteran and The Trajectory Builder disqualify on generic content within a single visit, often before the firm gets a chance to compete on credentials. The site has one contact form, one stale gated asset, and no scheduling path. That's the structural blocker against every other recommendation in this playbook.
Data note: Google Analytics access was indicated as forthcoming but not received during the audit window. Traffic-volume and conversion-rate baselines below are inferred from typical small-RIA template performance and the firm's stated client-acquisition rate rather than measured directly. Once GA4 is connected, the conversion-rate baseline can be measured against the recommendations.
The two lowest-graded categories — Conversion Path and Content Quality — both fail the same test: tech-sophisticated prospects need to find substance and a way to act on the very first visit. Without both, the credentials never get a fair hearing.
The site isn't "bad" in the way most audits flag — it's structurally insufficient against a tech-fluent audience that disqualifies within one visit. This is foundation work, not a redesign sprint.
Fix the architecture, and every other channel in this playbook works harder.
A clean site structure does two things at once: it tells human visitors where to go, and it tells search engines (Google and AI tools) what the firm is actually about. The map below shows the minimum viable structure — every page has a job, and every job ties back to a conversion or a credibility signal.
Every cornerstone earns its place by mapping to a specific persona, a specific keyword cluster, and a specific lead magnet that captures the visit before it converts.
These are the pages that need to exist (or be rebuilt) in the first 90 days. Each is sized to a specific buyer scenario — and each connects back to a search query the audience is already typing.
| Page | Target Keyword Cluster | Persona | What It's Doing |
|---|---|---|---|
| /microsoft-fman-planning New cornerstone |
Microsoft RSU vesting, FMAN cadence, charitable timing | The Equity Veteran | Captures senior Microsoft employees researching the August vest cycle — converts to FMAN Decision Framework lead magnet. |
| /severance-planning New cornerstone (30-day priority) |
Microsoft buyout, post-layoff financial planning, Rule of 70 | The Trajectory Builder (acute) | Captures the ~8,750 Microsoft employees in the April 2026 buyout window — converts to Severance 90-Day Guide. |
| /trajectory-planning New cornerstone |
Advisor under $1M, sub-$1M tech professional, fee-only Bellevue | The Trajectory Builder | Surfaces the one-time financial plan offering as a real entry point — opens an audience the firm currently turns away. |
| /qsbs-founder-planning New cornerstone |
QSBS qualification, Section 1202, OBBBA, Washington conformity | The Pre-Liquidity Founder | Statutory-precision page that becomes the citation source for an uncontested AI-search territory. |
| /schedule New conversion page |
Schedule call, book consultation | All three personas | Calendly-integrated path with persona-segmented intake — the conversion endpoint every cornerstone links to. |
| /about + principal bios Refresh |
David Chen CFP CFA Bellevue, fee-only fiduciary Seattle | All three personas | Trust-signal page tech-fluent buyers visit before scheduling. Needs current headshots and substance. |
The brand work isn't cosmetic — it solves two specific problems that block discoverability and trust: the name collision with a Pennsylvania bank-affiliated firm that owns the search ranking for "Meridian Wealth Partners," and a stale visual surface that contradicts the firm's actual sophistication.
Search is no longer just Google. 25% of $100K+ households now begin their advisor search through AI tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity — and the tech-employed prospects Meridian targets over-index materially on that behavior. Showing up in those answers isn't optional; it's the new front door. And the territory is genuinely open right now because most RIAs haven't built for it yet.
Search isn't a one-channel investment either. It works because every other piece of the system feeds it: cornerstone content gives AI tools something authoritative to cite, lead magnets capture visits before they bounce, the email sequence nurtures across 3-10 week research windows, and the website conversion path turns the visit into a booked call. Search is the discovery engine; everything else turns discovery into pipeline.
Data note: Google Search Console access was indicated as uncertain in intake and was not received during the audit window. The findings below come from five empirical AI-search tests we ran against ChatGPT and Perplexity using prospect-relevant queries, plus competitor SERP analysis. They do not include the firm's actual measured search-impression data or click-through history. Once Search Console is connected, these recommendations can be measured against real query volume rather than inferred from prospect-side testing.
Search visibility isn't a goal in itself — it's the front door of the system. The diagram below shows where it sits and what has to be true for it to convert into actual client conversations.
Search alone doesn't produce clients. Search plus the rest of this system does. Schema and cornerstones unlock the first step; cornerstones plus lead magnets unlock the second; lead magnets plus email unlock the third. Skip any layer and the prior layer's investment doesn't compound.
The cost of waiting is structural rather than linear. AI search platforms tend to re-cite domains they've cited before — meaning the firms that publish authoritative content in the next 4-8 weeks will compound an advantage that becomes materially harder to displace later.
This is the most consequential insight in the audit. The territory is genuinely open today — and it will close as Consilio, Avier, Coldstream, and Stabler extend their content programs into long-tail scenarios.
The cost of delay isn't a slower start — it's a structurally harder fight later.
Keywords don't work in isolation — buyers search around a topic in clusters, asking variations of the same underlying question. Each cluster below is a content opportunity sized to a specific persona and a specific business outcome. Intent labels are color-coded: Commercial = ready to buy, Informational = researching.
Captures the ~8,750 Microsoft employees in the active April 2026 buyout window. Highest urgency, shortest path from search to scheduled call — and the territory most at risk of closing if a competitor publishes first.
Captures senior Microsoft and Amazon employees during quarterly vest cycles — the highest-volume keyword opportunity in the audit. Doubles as the "depth test" content that tech-fluent buyers use to qualify advisors.
Opens an audience tier the firm currently turns away. Most Bellevue fee-only competitors enforce $1M minimums — this territory is genuinely uncontested because minimum-rigid competitors structurally can't compete here.
Statutory-precision territory that the AI-search tests confirmed is uncontested. Founder-axis content compounds across LinkedIn and Twitter/X, and feeds the separate fixed-fee scoping track that converts faster than the AUM track.
Search visibility isn't a single project — it's a sequence. Foundation first (so the work compounds), then the cornerstone content (so there's something for AI to cite), then the long-tail expansion (so the territory keeps growing).
The Microsoft April 23, 2026 voluntary buyout (Rule of 70, ~8,750 eligible, 30-day decision window) is the strongest time-sensitive content opportunity in the audit. Publishing the severance cornerstone within 30 days hits the closing edge of the first-mover window. Compliance review through RIA in a Box (2-3 day turnaround) makes this timeline feasible.
Search visibility is the lowest-graded category in the audit and the single highest-leverage place to invest. Foundation work in the next 30-60 days produces compounding citation authority for years.
Search authority isn't won in a quarter — but it is lost in one.
Paid media has a specific job: it accelerates audiences that have already proven they convert. It puts the right message in front of the right person at the moment they're searching, and it extends the reach of content that's already earning attention organically. What it can't do is manufacture demand that doesn't exist or fix conversion problems that live on the website. For Meridian, paid is a Phase 2 lever — not a Phase 1 lever.
The 2024 Google Ads test that produced "$200 financial plan" leads wasn't a paid media failure — it was running paid spend before conversion infrastructure existed and before positioning was clear. The same dollars in Phase 2, on a site with cornerstone pages, schema, lead magnets, and Calendly, perform differently. Paid amplifies infrastructure; it doesn't replace it.
Data note: The 2024 Google Ads account still exists per intake but historical campaign-level performance data wasn't shared during the audit window. Phase 2 recommendations below are calibrated to the firm's stated budget capacity ($1,500-$2,000/mo) and industry benchmarks for tech-niche RIA campaigns, not to the firm's own historical CPCs or conversion rates.
Three things paid media is genuinely good at — and one thing it is not.
Two channels in, several declined. The math at $1,500-$2,000/month doesn't support breadth — it supports focus. Phase 2 deploys after conversion infrastructure is in place (estimated 4-6 month window from kickoff).
Three example ads below — two Google Search and one LinkedIn Sponsored. Each maps to a specific persona, a specific campaign goal, and a specific outcome. Full Phase 2 ad copy variations live in the appendix.
View all ad copy variations for four Phase 2 campaigns (Microsoft FMAN August Vest, Microsoft Buyout & Severance, Trajectory Positioning, QSBS Founder Window) — including LinkedIn Sponsored Content variants — in the complete campaign kit appendix.
Paid is a contributing channel, not the lever. At $1,500-$2,000/month on conversion-ready infrastructure, expect 3-6 qualified inquiries per month after the 90-day optimization period — not 15-20.
Paid amplifies a working system. It can't compensate for one that isn't.
A senior Microsoft employee researching what to do with their August vest is already having a conversation — with Google, with ChatGPT, with their tax-aware friend at a cocktail party, with the FAQ section of a competitor's website. The question for an RIA isn't whether to enter that conversation. It's whether the firm's voice is the one being heard. Content is how an advisor joins conversations they weren't invited to and earns trust before the first call.
The content kit below is the editorial spine for the next 90 days — and the asset base that gets repurposed across LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, email sequences, paid ads, cornerstone pages, and event amplification. One piece of pillar-level content becomes 6-10 derivative assets across channels. That's how a 2-advisor firm with ~3 marketing hours per week produces a marketing presence that looks like a much larger team.
Data note: Existing content inventory (~12 blog posts from 2020-2022, ~30 LinkedIn posts over 2 years, 1 four-year-old gated guide) was reviewed from the public site. Engagement analytics for the existing LinkedIn content were not accessible during the audit. Once LinkedIn page admin and historical engagement data are available, the pillar mix can be calibrated against the firm's actual top-performing post archetypes.
Three principles drive every piece of content produced. They are non-negotiable because each addresses a specific failure mode the firm has already seen.
Every piece names employers, statutes, dollar figures, and specific scenarios. The 2023 content agency failure was generic posts that "could have been writing for any advisor." The antidote is content so specific it could only have come from this firm.
Buyers research over weeks, not minutes. Content has to be there at every touchpoint — the first Google search, the second visit, the third LinkedIn scroll, the fourth email. Episodic content drops disappear before the buyer is ready.
Each cornerstone blog spawns 6-10 derivative assets: LinkedIn long-form, FB/IG carousels, email sequence content, ad creative, conference talk material, lead magnets. One investment, many surfaces.
Each pillar earns its place by sitting at the intersection of three things: a persona Meridian wants to serve, a real buyer pain point the firm is uniquely equipped to address, and an open competitive territory the audit confirmed. The voice modulates per persona; the discipline doesn't.
Highest-volume keyword opportunity in the audit. Doubles as the "depth test" tech-fluent buyers use to screen advisors. Specific employer mechanics (Microsoft FMAN, Amazon 5/15/40/40, Meta double-trigger, Google GSU stacking) are inherently search-friendly and inherently disqualifying for generalist competitors.
Positioning-anchored gap that minimum-rigid competitors structurally can't compete in. Surfaces the one-time financial plan offering (currently 8% of revenue, invisible on the site) as a real entry point. Feeds the AUM track on a 12-24 month nurture cycle — many trajectory clients become AUM clients later.
Time-sensitive deployment opportunity. ~8,750 Microsoft employees are in the active April 2026 buyout window. The audit confirmed a 4-8 week first-mover window before Coldstream and Stabler extend their coverage. Deployable in 24-72 hours of a major layoff announcement.
Uncontested AI-search territory confirmed by the audit. Statutory-currency precision filters out generalist competitors automatically. Runs on the separate fixed-fee scoping track that converts faster than the AUM track — and many founders convert again at liquidity event.
Content has to ship rhythmically. A blog dropped once a quarter doesn't compound; a 2x-weekly LinkedIn cadence with monthly cornerstone blogs and weekly FB/IG presence does. The calendar below is what continuous conversation actually looks like for a 2-advisor firm with ~3 hours per week of capacity.
| Blog Draft | Persona | Priority | Why This Now |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft FMAN August vest charitable contribution timing | The Equity Veteran | High | Narrower angle on August vest where Avier has not occupied |
| 10b5-1 plan setup for Microsoft VPs | The Equity Veteran | High | Very low competition; persona-credible long-tail |
| Severance-window equity-sale strategy | The Trajectory Builder (acute) | Critical | First-mover window per Test 5; deployable in 24-72 hours of layoff |
| Amazon RSU 5/15/40/40 year-three tax planning | The Equity Veteran | High | Avier + Atkinson partial coverage; year-three-specific page open |
| QSBS qualification for Bellevue tech founders post-OBBBA | The Pre-Liquidity Founder | High | Uncontested AI-search territory; statutory currency |
For senior Microsoft employees with charitable-giving intent, the August FMAN vest is often the highest-leverage charitable-contribution timing decision of the year. The income recognition is large enough that the tax deduction matters at scale, the calendar timing falls inside the year-end charitable-giving window, and the post-vest equity position creates the option to contribute appreciated shares rather than cash — which compounds the tax leverage further.
One firm voice, three persona modulations. Every piece of content in this kit is specific enough that it could not have been written by any other firm.
The voice is the moat. It's the one thing competitors with bigger budgets still can't copy.
View all 5 cornerstone blog drafts (full text, 1,800-2,500 words each, FAQPage schema specifications) and all 32 social posts (full text, image prompts, engagement mechanics, compliance flags) in the complete content production appendix.
LinkedIn, Google, and AI search platforms all rent attention against their own algorithms. Email is different — once a prospect is on your list, you can reach them directly, on your timing, with content built for them. But your list has been dormant for five months. Before you can nurture anyone, you have to rebuild the technical foundation that lets your emails reach the inbox.
This tab walks through five email sequences sized to your two-track content architecture (Employer Axis for Personas 1 & 2, Founder Axis for Persona 3). All email copy is written for you in the campaign kit appendix — you don't have to draft any of it from scratch.
An email sequence is a pre-written series of emails that goes out automatically when a prospect does something specific — usually downloading a lead magnet (a free guide), filling out a form, or being identified as part of a defined segment. You set it up once in an automated mailing system (e.g. MailerLite). The platform sends each email on the schedule you define. The prospect experiences a continuous, useful conversation; you don't have to touch it after setup.
Something happens that puts a prospect into a sequence: they download a lead magnet, get tagged in a segment, or are identified as part of the engaged subset after Sequence 0. The trigger is the entry point.
Emails go out on a defined schedule — every 3-5 days for nurture, every 2-3 days for acute triggers. The pace matches what the prospect needs at that moment. Nurture is slow trust-building. Acute is fast and useful.
Every sequence ends with the same goal: the prospect books a discovery call through your scheduling tool (e.g. Calendly). Nurture sequences earn that booking through repeated value. Acute sequences earn it by being calm and useful during a stressful decision.
Before any nurture sequence runs, the technical plumbing has to work. Five months of silence has degraded the firm's sender reputation. If you re-engage 800 dormant contacts without verified sender authentication, the broadcast routes to spam — regardless of how good the content is. That makes the problem worse, not better.
Once sender authentication is verified and Sequence 0 identifies the ~80-120 engaged contacts on the list, every subsequent sequence operates against a clean foundation. The path from D- to B+ is roughly 14 weeks of disciplined execution.
Sequence 0 is not nurture content. It is sender-reputation rehabilitation that produces a working list as its output.
Do this in Week 1. Everything else in this tab depends on it.
Here's the high-level map. Each prospect enters one sequence based on what they did — downloaded which guide, came in via which channel, hit which trigger event. All paths lead to a discovery call (booked through your scheduling tool, e.g. Calendly). The diagram below shows what feeds what.
Each sequence below tells you who it's for, what triggers it, what lead magnet (if any) it connects to, what landing page work is needed, and what the prospect experiences. The actual email copy lives in the campaign kit appendix — your job is to configure these in MailerLite, not write them.
Your full ~800-contact dormant list. This is a one-time broadcast to identify who's still paying attention.
You manually send it after Week 1 sender authentication is verified. There is no lead magnet trigger — this runs before any automation is set up.
No. Sequence 0 emails point to existing pages (your About page, a recent podcast appearance, a featured cornerstone). No new landing page work.
~30-50% of the list opens at least one email. Those contacts (roughly 80-120 people) become your engaged subset. Everyone else gets archived to a "cold" segment.
Persona 1 — The Equity Veteran. Senior Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Google employees with stacked equity compensation.
Downloads Lead Magnet 1: Microsoft FMAN Vesting Decision Framework. Auto-enters Sequence 1 the moment the form submits.
Yes. Lead Magnet 1 needs its own landing page — short form, clear value proposition, immediate PDF delivery. This is a one-time build (Weeks 7-9).
Long nurture. 5-week conversation building trust through technical depth. CTA on email 5 or 6 routes to your scheduling tool (e.g. Calendly) with no-minimum-AUM signaling.
Persona 2 — The Trajectory Builder. Mid-career tech employees with $500K-$1M net worth heading toward $1M+ in 18-24 months.
Same Lead Magnet 1 download, but persona-tagged as Trajectory based on the form field. Sequence 2 fires instead of Sequence 1.
Same landing page as Sequence 1. Only the sequence differs based on persona tag.
Medium nurture with explicit trajectory framing. Surfaces the one-time financial plan offering (currently invisible on the site). CTA routes to your scheduling tool with a "trajectory consultation" path.
Anyone in an active severance/layoff window — Microsoft Rule of 70, Amazon RTO-driven exits, Meta/Google reductions. Mix of Personas 1 and 2.
Downloads Lead Magnet 2: Severance 90-Day Decision Framework. Auto-enters Sequence 3 immediately.
Yes — and urgently. Lead Magnet 2 landing page is a Week 4 deliverable to catch the Microsoft April 23, 2026 buyout cycle.
Acute, compressed cadence. Calm, structured, useful — never urgency. Every email moves the prospect toward a specific decision. Email 4 routes to your scheduling tool with a "severance consultation" path.
Persona 3 — The Bellevue Tech Founder. Pre-exit founders evaluating QSBS / §1202 / 10b5-1 planning.
A visitor on the QSBS cornerstone page fills out a "Talk through your QSBS scenario" form. No lead magnet PDF — the form itself is the entry.
The QSBS cornerstone page itself acts as the landing page (Week 12 deliverable). No separate lead-magnet page.
Short, direct. Founders convert faster on direct scoping than on extended nurture. Email 3 routes to a fixed-fee scoping conversation, not a generic discovery call.
Two examples below to give you a feel for the voice. One is nurture-mode (slow, depth-positioning). The other is acute-trigger (calm, structured, useful). Full content for all 21 emails across the five sequences lives in the campaign kit appendix.
All 21 emails are written for you. Subject lines, body content, send timing, and compliance considerations for Sequence 0 (3 emails) plus Sequences 1-4 (18 emails total) live in the campaign kit appendix. Your work is configuring them in your automated mailing system (e.g. MailerLite) and verifying the trigger logic — not drafting from scratch.
The biggest reason marketing fails at small RIAs isn't bad ideas — it's that one principal can't sustain four separate content channels. This tab shows how to take one piece of content and turn it into seven or more. Same effort. Many more places it shows up.
You have roughly 3 hours per week for marketing. If you spent all of that writing one LinkedIn post every week, you'd run out of capacity by mid-quarter. The integration approach below is how a 2-advisor firm produces a marketing presence that looks like a much larger team — by making each anchor piece of content work across multiple channels.
Your three personas split into two tracks. Most of your content gets produced once and used across both tracks. The split only kicks in at the very end — where each track converts differently.
For Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Google employees (Persona 1) and trajectory-stage builders heading toward $1M+ (Persona 2).
For Bellevue-area tech founders evaluating pre-exit planning. Very different research style — peer-to-peer, statute-literate.
Three different starting points, three different ways content gets multiplied. Each pathway describes: you make one thing → you deploy several things from it. The hours saved are what makes the cadence sustainable.
One in-depth LinkedIn post on a specific scenario — say, "How the Microsoft August FMAN vest interacts with AMT for senior engineers."
1) The long-form LinkedIn post itself. 2) A LinkedIn short-form variant. 3) A LinkedIn carousel breaking down the decision tree. 4) A blog post version on your site. 5) An email feature in Sequence 1. 6) A quarterly broadcast highlight. 7) An FAQ block for AI search visibility.
Three podcast appearances and the 2024 meetup talk. All four are already compliance-cleared. The material exists; it just hasn't been deployed.
YouTube channel embeds, Email Sequence 0 featured content, 5 derivative LinkedIn posts pulling specific quotes/insights, cornerstone-page embeds with timestamps. This is the highest-leverage stack you have — start here.
A cornerstone page is a deeper, more permanent piece on your website — the Microsoft FMAN cornerstone, the severance cornerstone, the QSBS cornerstone. These act as the durable destination for AI search and SEO.
A LinkedIn long-form companion piece, 2-3 short-form LinkedIn derivatives, an email lead-magnet adjacency, a quarterly broadcast highlight. For founder-axis cornerstones (QSBS), also a Twitter/X thread.
Here's how the pathways come together in actual campaign moments. Each campaign coordinates multiple channels around a single timing window — a vest cycle, a layoff cycle, a planning season. Two of these can run in Phase 1 (organic-first). The third waits for Phase 2.
Most 2-advisor firms fail at marketing the same way: they try to run four independent channels and quietly drop three within a quarter. The repurposing approach is the fix.
Start with Pathway 2 (the content you already have). It costs zero new hours and lets the system get rolling before you have to produce anything fresh.
This is the operating doc — the one you can print, mark up, and check off as you go. Each week has 2-4 specific actions, sized to your documented ~3 hours per week. Each action explains what you're doing, why it matters, who owns it, and what done looks like.
The 90 days break into three blocks. Weeks 1-2 are foundation — sender authentication, analytics, compliance batch, brand-collision resolution. Weeks 3-6 are content build — schema and the first two cornerstones. Weeks 7-12 are acceleration — the August FMAN campaign deploys and the founder-axis batch comes online. Week 13 is the retrospective and Phase 2 decision.
Everything you've read in the prior tabs of this playbook lands here as scheduled, owned work. This is the single doc where strategy becomes execution. If a recommendation appears in an earlier tab, the corresponding action shows up below in a specific week with a specific owner.
Two bundles available at the top of this playbook: Strategy Documents (the playbook itself plus appendices) and Production Assets (the editable email copy, social posts, blog drafts, and lead-magnet source files). Both download buttons live in the header — same place as Schedule a Call.
Before the week-by-week, here are the three strategic priorities every action below serves. If you ever have to triage — a week gets cut short, an emergency hits, you have to pick what stays and what slides — these three are the ones you protect.
This block is non-negotiable. Nothing downstream works until these clear. Plan for ~5-6 hours each week.
By the end of this week, you should have analytics access confirmed, email sender authentication verified, your CCO batch submitted, and the first two LinkedIn posts published. None of these are big tasks individually — but they unlock everything else.
Sender authentication is verified. The CCO batch comes back. Sequence 0 Email 1 goes out to the dormant list. The severance cornerstone draft begins.
The two cornerstones launch. Schema goes site-wide. Sequence 0 completes and Sequence 1 begins. Plan for ~3-4 hours each week.
Severance cornerstone publishes Week 4. Lead Magnet 2 landing page goes live the same week. Sequence 3 activates in your automated mailing system (e.g. MailerLite). Sequence 0 Email 2 sends in Week 3.
Site-wide schema implementation validates Week 5. Microsoft FMAN cornerstone publishes Week 6 (gives 4 weeks of indexing before August). Sequence 0 finishes; engaged subset is identified.
Lead Magnet 1 launches. The FMAN August vest campaign deploys. Founder-axis batch comes online. QSBS cornerstone production starts. Plan for ~3-4 hours per week, with Weeks 9-13 spiking to ~4 hours during active campaign.
Founder-axis CCO batch clears Week 7. Lead Magnet 1 production begins (FMAN Vesting Decision Framework PDF) targeting Week 9 publication. QSBS cornerstone drafting starts.
Lead Magnet 1 publishes Week 9. The FMAN August Vest Cycle campaign deploys. Sequence 1 reactivation push hits the engaged subset. QSBS cornerstone publishes Week 12. Week 13 retrospective happens at the end.
Three categories of metric. Leading indicators tell you whether the foundation is going in on time. Lagging indicators tell you whether the work is starting to compound. Conversion indicators are the ones that ultimately matter — qualified Calendly inbound.
Your stated 12-month goal is 25-30 new client households against a documented baseline of 6-8 per year. Phase 1 is foundation-laying — expecting the full 25-30 lift in 90 days is unrealistic. Expecting 1-2 traceable digital-acquisition inquiries plus measurable infrastructure improvement is the realistic Phase 1 deliverable. The sustained-execution discipline you build in this 90-day window is the operating-model investment that makes the 12-month goal achievable across Q2-Q4 — not the 90-day window itself.
This is the visual companion to the Activation Plan tab. Same plan, same actions, same week blocks — just laid out as a calendar grid you can scan. Click any item on the calendar for plain-language detail on what it is, what it requires, and what done looks like.
The Activation Plan tab is the working version — printable, owner-assigned, with checkbox-level detail. This Calendar tab is the at-a-glance scan you reference when you want to see the whole 90 days at once or trace how channels coordinate week to week. If something on the calendar is confusing, the Activation Plan has the same item with full context.
Looking for the working version? The Activation Plan tab has every item on this calendar broken out into checkbox-level detail, with owners assigned and effort estimates. Use Calendar to scan; use Activation Plan to execute.
This playbook is yours to keep — the strategy, the calendar, the action plan, the email sequences, the campaign concepts. What happens next is a question of operating model: who actually executes the work week to week? The four options below escalate from full DIY to full operations partnership.
A 2-advisor firm with ~3 marketing hours per week and a clear playbook can absolutely run this themselves. But many firms find that the binding constraint isn't the strategy — it's protecting that 3 hours from getting consumed by client work, planning sessions, and CCO coordination. The options below map to different answers on that constraint.
Four engagement options, escalating in scope. Start where the constraint actually is. You can always move up or down based on what you learn in the first 90 days.
This playbook is everything you need to run the 90-day plan yourself: the calendar, the action plan, the email sequence specs, and the appendix with 21 pre-written emails and CCO-prep content.
Best fit: Internal capacity is real, principal motivation is high, and the firm wants to own execution end-to-end.
A 90-minute strategy call every 90 days with the SuperSymm team. We review your KPIs, run AI search citation testing across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude, and recalibrate the next quarter's plan against your actual results.
Best fit: You're executing internally but want an outside eye on direction, gaps, and what's compounding.
SuperSymm executes a specific work stream on fixed scope. Examples: cornerstone content sprint, schema implementation, Microsoft FMAN cycle campaign deployment, website conversion infrastructure rebuild, or the Phase 2 paid media launch.
Best fit: You want internal execution generally, but a specific deliverable is outside internal capacity or expertise.
SuperSymm operates the integrated stack end-to-end: cornerstone content production, LinkedIn cadence, email sequences, paid amplification, and compliance coordination with your CCO. Monthly performance review plus quarterly strategy recalibration.
Best fit: Your 3 hours/week is the binding constraint and the firm wants the playbook executed at production cadence without internal lift.
What progress looks like against the firm's stated 12-month goal of 25-30 new client households (baseline of 6-8/year). These are the anchors to come back to during each 90-day strategy review.
At 90 days: Foundation in place. Severance and Microsoft FMAN cornerstones live. Sequence 0 complete with engaged subset identified. 1-2 traceable digital-acquisition inquiries.
At 180 days: Phase 2 paid amplification active. 4-6 monthly inquiries from non-referral sources. AI search citations accumulating on 3+ priority queries.
At 12 months: The 25-30 new client households target is achievable with sustained execution plus Phase 2 paid amplification plus Q2-Q4 cornerstone publication compounding into AI search authority.
Two things, both within reach — regardless of which engagement option you pick.
Execute the foundation. Sustain the cadence. The 12-month goal is achievable.
Questions about which engagement option fits, pricing, or anything else in this playbook — get in touch and we'll work through it together.
This playbook was prepared from information provided during intake on the dates documented in the engagement record. Brand-collision findings (multiple Meridian Wealth Partners entities including a Pennsylvania-based firm sharing the firm name) and synthetic-intake-data flags are surfaced in the relevant tabs and remain operative recommendations. All compliance-related content recommendations require review by the firm's Chief Compliance Officer before deployment.